Cases 91 - 100 of 219
Holmes v. Illinois Department of Corrections Director, The et al
as 1:2016cv09475
Plaintiff:
Vincent Holmes
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Director, The, Northern Reception and Classification Center, The, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJABU v. HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv02613
Plaintiff:
KOFI MODIBO AJABU
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ERIC K. KOSELKE, SONIA LEERKAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Fortier v. Terani Law Firm, et al
as 16-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD FORTIER
Defendant - Appellee:
TERANI LAW FIRM and MICHAEL D. TERANI
Fox v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Corey L Fox
Defendant:
John Ross Daugherty and John Ross Daugherty Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv50287
Plaintiff:
McClain Sanders
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Dyer, Jill Wahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis Henderson v. Lucas Edgar, et al
as 16-3168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLIS M. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LUCAS EDGAR, Correctional Officer and BYRON LAW, Lieutenant
Felski v. Necci et al
as 2:2016cv01062
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Felski
Defendant:
Daniel Necci , Diane M Resch Donohoo, Phillip Koss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Herzog et al
as 1:2016cv07960
Plaintiff:
Darrico Dewayne Mitchell
Defendant:
Anndra L Herzog, Christopher Ehresman and Bruce Dorn Ferral & Associate Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPICER v. KREINHOPP, et al
as 4:2016cv00139
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, MICHAEL R. KREINHOPP and JOHN LANTER
Plaintiff:
HARRY SPICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2016cv00933
Plaintiff:
Charles E Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin , John Doe, Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
