Cases 161 - 170 of 101,663
WRIGHT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER M. WRIGHT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHANAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
ALVIN RAY BUCHANAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
COREY L. BRYANT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalaf, Hussein v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Hussein Khalaf
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Contractors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WERTZ v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
KURT WERTZ
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilke v. Broughton
as 2:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Wilke
Respondent:
Gary Broughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nkufi v. ICE
as 2:2024cv00676
Petitioner:
Moise Nkufi
Respondent:
ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Perkins v. Bamke et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Defendant:
Aaron Bamke, Jane Doe and Gary Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Love v. Christopher Hoffman
as 24-1936
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. LOVE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOFFMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
