Cases 11 - 20 of 281
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. TYLER et al
as 1:2023cv02187
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
CHADD TYLER, C. QUARRIER and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA HARRIS and J. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. CENTURION OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
SETH ADAM VILCHUCK
Defendant:
CENTURION OF INDIANA, LISA HAMBLEN, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
J. JACKSON, M. SOMMERS and T. SOLOMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTSOCK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, ROBERT BUPREY, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. DILDINE
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE ADAMS
Defendant:
LANE DILDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
