Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Gakuba v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv05429
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-50 and Dorothy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gakuba v. Rains et al
as 3:2019cv00437
Defendant:
David Rains, Michelle Neese, John/Jane Does, 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Alevizos et al
as 3:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
James Demarco Bogan and James D Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J Alevizos, John Does 1-50 and 60th Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbie Bowen v. Scott Walker, et al
as 17-2505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBIE BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT WALKER, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR. PLEUSS and others
ANNAMALAI v. SEIREVELD et al
as 2:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant:
ASHOK ANNAMALAI, JOHN DOE BASKERVILLE, TODD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McIntosh v. Dodge County et al
as 1:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Charles T McIntosh
Defendant:
Dodge County, Unknown, Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Kenosha County et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Charles T McIntosh
Defendant:
Kenosha County, Unknown, Mayor City of Kenosha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Manitowoc County et al
as 1:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Charles T McIntosh
Defendant:
Manitowoc County, Unknown, Mayor City of Manitowoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Hart, Jr. v. Michael Thurmer, et al
as 13-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE J. HART, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL THURMER, SUSAN KIMBALL, PAUL SUMNICHT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
