Cases 11 - 20 of 1,186
BARNUM v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE BARNUM
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, HALL and DEPOSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Callahan et al
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
DeWayne D Knight
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Callahan, St Luke's Memorial Hospital of Racine, ABC Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Walls
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Carl W Knight
Defendant:
CO Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VOYLES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02139
Petitioner:
LEONARD VOYLES
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia et al v. Cornett et al
as 3:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
James Garcia, James S Garcia, Montez Harris and others
Defendant:
Tracy Cornett, Gary Lewis, Joseph Farley and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02167
Petitioner:
DALLAS JONES
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Greene et al
as 1:2023cv15664
Petitioner:
Loniel Knight
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Federal Correctional Institution Medical Staff
as 1:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Jack Eugene Knight
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROSE v. HEFLIN et al
as 1:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. ROSE
Defendant:
JOHN HEFLIN, KATE WILKS, DAVID GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY PARKER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, WARDEN, RIDGEWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
