Cases 11 - 20 of 510
Maurice Gardner v. USA
as 24-1468
Petitioner:
MAURICE D. GARDNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00860
Petitioner:
Ronnie Maurice Jones
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Cross et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Dezzan Phillips
Defendant:
Maurice Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Walmart Supercenter #5965 et al
as 1:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter #5965, Walmart (Franchise) Corp. and Security Personel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Executive Director Cook County Health and Hospital Systems et al
as 1:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Executive Director Cook County Health and Hospital Systems, Susan Shobel, Div 6 Dispensary Training Dept. Head Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brough v. Gallaway et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brough
Defendant:
Warden Gallaway, C/O White, Lt. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Maurice v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson, Jr. and Maurice M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Weakley v. Redman et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Travell Maurice Lynn Weakley
Defendant:
William J Redman, Olmstead and Zawistowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Pitts v. Rob Jeffries, et al
as 23-3202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFRIES, DAVID GOMEZ, MAURICE A. GEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
