Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Kenneth Fulton v. Michael Jones, et al
as 17-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH FULTON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL JONES, Chief and J. SIMS, Det Srgt. #102
Fulton v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv03634
Plaintiff: Kenneth Fulton
Defendant: Michael Jones and J. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ALSIP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00257
Defendant: DUANE ALSIP, DANKIN, DENNIS DAVIS and others
Plaintiff: DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ZETECKY, ET AL
as 1:2016cv03347
Plaintiff: DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant: BRUCE LEMMON, LT. K. SAMONE, VINCENT STANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ZATECKY
as 1:2016cv01393
Petitioner: DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv02662
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: T. Everhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Murphy et al
as 1:2014cv08046
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: John Q. Murphy, Tom Dart, Classifing Officer of the Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dart
as 1:2014cv04416
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rury et al
as 4:2012cv04042
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: . Rury and . Funk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietrich v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00352
Plaintiff: Jacob T Dietrich
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kathryn R Anderson, Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?