Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, A. McCaffery, G. Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2022cv02192
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mansoori v. Dr. Montgomery
as 1:2022cv02470
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mansoori
Defendant:
Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNT v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv00768
Petitioner:
WYATT HUNT
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRANT v. MONTGOMERY SUPERIOR COURT #2
as 1:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
PHILIP JOHN BRANT
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY SUPERIOR COURT #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIGGINS v. MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv02898
Plaintiff:
LESTER RIGGINS
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, DUVALL WORK RELEASE CENTER, PATTY MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNT v. JEFFRIES et al
as 1:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
WYATT W. HUNT
Defendant:
KEVIN L. JEFFRIES, TYLER BOWLING, KERRY RANDLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTLETT v. MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM et al
as 1:2021cv02584
Plaintiff:
JEREMY M. BARTLETT
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM, DANIEL G. PETRIE, HARRY A. SIAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKERS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 1:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant:
KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD, JAMIE CONOVER, ALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
