Cases 11 - 20 of 85
MALONE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00661
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., COUNTY OF MARION-CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CAROLE JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00373
Defendant:
MARTIN, PRICE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton v. The City of Bolingbrook et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Officer name unknown, Bolingbrook Police Department and The City of Bolingbrook
Plaintiff:
Ryan Alton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner Bey v. Finch et al
as 3:2020cv00804
Defendant:
P Finch, Vanderstar, R Darchuski and others
Plaintiff:
Akeem Turner Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIKER v. WATSON et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EUGENE SPIKER and MELISSA ANNE SPIKER
Defendant:
T. J. WATSON and NAME UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YANCEY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2019cv00556
Defendant:
MATA, WILSON, MUSCATELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA YANCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phelps v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00643
Defendant:
Connelly, McNeal, Dan Last Name Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Cody W Phelps
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross, Amontre v. Mendota Health Institute et al
as 3:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Mendota Health Institute, Another identifable male and Simpie (Last name unknown)
Plaintiff:
Amontre Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, City of Chicago Police Dept., Mary Ellen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
