Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Norwood v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv02862
Plaintiff:
Ricky Norwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay Carter, Brian Carter, Troy Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley et al v. Lt Porter et al
as 1:2022cv04947
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley, Victor Short, Lashawn Norwood and others
Defendant:
Lt Porter, Charles Truitt, Wexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Davis, et al
as 1:2022cv03964
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Davis and C Khollman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Norwood
as 1:2022cv03780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deronarte Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Norwood
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Director Wilensky, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORWOOD v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVID NORWOOD
Defendant:
BYRD and DR. RAJOLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Sheriff of Kane County Hain et al
as 1:2021cv05278
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Sheriff of Kane County Hain, Kane County, Illinois, C. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Czerniak et al
as 1:2020cv07773
Defendant:
Posmani, Wexford Health Soures Inc., Ron Hain and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07628
Defendant:
Mizel N. Brooks, City of Chicago, Derrick W. Pickett and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Division of Community Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Defendant:
Troy Plos, Division of Community Corrections and Christopher Saldana
Plaintiff:
Jor-El Tristen Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
