Cases 11 - 20 of 349
Irvin Perez v. Quinton Perrigen
as 23-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVIN PEREZ, also known as IRVIN H. PEREZ, also known as IRVIN PEREZ H.
Defendant / Appellee:
QUINTON PERRIGEN, Correctional Officer
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 23-3208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Stewart v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv15969
Plaintiff:
Wynton P. Steward and Wynton P Stewart
Defendant:
R. Szul, G. Perez 03, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ladewig v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ladewig
Defendant:
Amanda Perez, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Bryan Royce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Perez
as 1:2023cv14821
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Enochs v. Bocknak et al
as 1:2023cv14811
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debrante Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Haine, A. Bocknak, F. Byndum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barghouti v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50327
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy, Susan Tuell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Sara Moore, Clerk Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
