Cases 11 - 20 of 362
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03793
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv03835
Petitioner:
Jason Dominik Tyler Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Doherty
as 1:2023cv15025
Plaintiff:
Larone Williams
Defendant:
Chicago, Gregory J. Doherty, Johnathan M. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montano-Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv01431
Petitioner:
Gabriel Montano-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ELLIOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIOTT, ANTWAIN JONES, ANTHONY STEWART and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duarte-Rodriguez v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50333
Petitioner:
Jose Ulise Duarte-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States Of America and Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gevas v. Manzano et al
as 3:2023cv50383
Plaintiff:
David Gevas
Defendant:
Art Manzano, Samantha Rodriguez and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Rodrigueze
as 3:2023cv03305
Defendant:
Mare L Rodrigueze and Elizabeth Mare Packard
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Rodriguez, III
Defendant:
Virginia Martinez, Craig Findley, Christine Brannon-Dortch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Smous et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Morton
Defendant:
Wade Smous, Antonio Rodriguez and Andrew A Krumwied
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
