Cases 11 - 20 of 1,284
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Roger Casillas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Rogers
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Allen Rogers
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison and Ron Neil
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01682
Petitioner:
Patrick D Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Dennis Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Groves v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Leslie Groves
Defendant:
Roger Johnson, . Benson, . Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas, Sr. v. Stanback et al
as 1:2023cv14125
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Donte Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
L. Stanback, Dominique McDonald, Richard Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14031
Plaintiff:
Allen Patton
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Susan Shebel, Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00450
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curiel v. Marik
as 1:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Roger Curiel
Defendant:
Peter Marik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
