Cases 11 - 20 of 622
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
JB Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Moffett v. Travis Haag, et al
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
TRAVIS HAAG and SHANON SCHMIDTKNECHT
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, TRINITY FOOD SERVICES GROUP, H. SOLAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dyson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Robert Stevens, Danielle Tucker, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, SECURITY DIRECTOR WEBBER, MICHAEL BUETTNER and others
Stevenson v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Cordarryl Stevenson
Defendant:
Alex Maldonado, Ms Walters and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
