Cases 21 - 30 of 101,856
Barghouti v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50230
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Jaimi Lahman, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Dirk Singleton
Defendant:
Chad Jennings, Medical Director and Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaughter v. Mr. Walter
as 1:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Jennifer Slaughter
Respondent:
Mr. Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. IDOC Medical Department et al
as 3:2024cv03154
Plaintiff:
Keytori M. Jackson
Defendant:
IDOC Medical Department, . Fennell and IDOC Administration Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
Kevin James
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes and J B Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grace v. Calvart et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
O'Shun R Grace and O
Defendant:
Jamie Calvart and Brian English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. English
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sara English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
