Cases 21 - 30 of 2,431
Mark Byrd v. Marliana Munoz, et al
as 24-1618
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BYRD
Defendant:
MARLIANA MUNOZ, MACKENZIE PRATT, DANIELLE FALETTI and others
Jones, Dynzel v. Sanders, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dynzel Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Sanders, Paula Kuecker, Feltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stalker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stalker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Chad Jennings and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis Thompson v. Sheyde Perry, et al
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS THOMPSON
Defendant:
SHEYDE PERRY, TERRY COLLINS and DANIELLE MERRIFIELD
Bernard v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50134
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Amanda Irick, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Randy v. Lavoie, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Randy Keith Scott
Defendant:
Daniel L. Lavoie and Nicole Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
