Cases 21 - 30 of 370
BANKHEAD v. GRAY et al
as 1:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
J. GRAY, M. PFLEEGER, M SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bankhead v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Actora Meconn Bankhead
Defendant:
J Gray, M Pfleeger, M Sommers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGALLS v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
STEVEN INGALLS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, ELIZABETH BENNETT, TRACY COBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ELLIS, WARDEN, BUILDING LIEUTENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SHADRAK NICHOLS, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WARD
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC, BOBBI RIGGS, SARA BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
State of Illinois and William Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Ellis v. USA
as 23-2275
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMIAH ELLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GARCIA v. HANCOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
GENARO GARCIA
Defendant:
ALLEN HANCOCK, MIKE ELLIS and SHELBY CRICHFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
