Cases 21 - 30 of 209
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST, et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, MR JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwartz v. Ernest et al
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Schwartz and Jason Schwartz
Defendant:
J Ernest, Jackson, Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GENRICH v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
PAUL GENRICH
Defendant:
LAMAR, MCCASSIDY, VERDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. MCCAFFERY et al
as 1:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
CORY M. WALLACE
Defendant:
MCCAFFERY, LAMAR, KERIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker Jr. v. Unknown Sheriff's Deputy et al
as 1:2023cv04661
Plaintiff:
Lamar Baker Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Sheriff's Deputy and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khonsu El v. Sheriff
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Selah Khonsu El and Lamar James Wilson, Sr.
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, M. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenburg v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lamar Ellenburg
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Warden Jon Noble and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. St Joesph County Jail
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Deshannon Lamar Grady, Sr
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
