Cases 21 - 30 of 38
KREILEIN v. LEMMON ET AL
as 1:2017cv03357
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN HORTH, ANTHONY KING, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kreilein v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
Alan Kreilein
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Gwendolyn Horth, Charles Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Madden Hosital et al
as 1:2017cv05055
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Person
Defendant:
Madden Hosital, John Doe, Hosital Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHMOND v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2017cv01923
Defendant:
DREW ADAMS, ROBERT CARTER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Person v. Madden Hospaid et al
as 1:2017cv01415
Plaintiff:
Richard Person
Defendant:
Madden Hospaid, John Joe and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Melvin
as 1:2017cv00724
Petitioner:
Irving Madden
Respondent:
Micheal B Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COX v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
GWEN HORTH, STANLEY KNIGHT, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COCHRAN et al v. COOK-CRAWFORD et al
as 3:2016cv00182
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LYN COCHRAN
Defendant:
BARBARA COOK-CRAWFORD, KASEY HAMMELL, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEGARDEN v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2016cv00266
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TEGARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
