Cases 31 - 40 of 451
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
DAVID MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. WOODS et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
WOODS and GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ZARAK THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER CUPP, NICHALAUS DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SHADRAK NICHOLS, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CUPP et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CUPP, BLAYZE RODGERS, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
NICHALAUS DONOVAN, ERIC DRADA, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. YARBER et al
as 2:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
RICK YARBER, CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ, NICHALAUS DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. YARBER et al
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
RICK YARBER, LAUREN CUPP, ASHLYNN LEDFORD-GONTHIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. LEDFORD-GONTHIER et al
as 2:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ASHLYNN LEDFORD-GONTHIER, ANDREW CHAMBERS and GARY SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
