Cases 31 - 40 of 1,568
Anderson v. Greene
as 3:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Andrew Anderson
Defendant:
Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Indiana CT State of et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana CT State of, Stephanie Steele, Andrew A Krumwied and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Whitmyer et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Tracey A Hardy and Tracey Arnell Hardy
Defendant:
Andrew Whitmyer, Brian Schroth and Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Neil et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
George W Wilson and George Wilson
Defendant:
Ron Neil, Pamela Bane, Richard Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ayande Andrews
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrence Downey v. Andrew Ciolli
as 24-1124
Petitioner:
TYRENCE DOWNEY
Respondent:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden
Sponhower v. Wexford of Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Elgin Andrew Sponhower and Elgin Sponhower
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Wexford of Indiana LLC, John Galipeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
