Cases 31 - 40 of 635
Lucas v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50416
Plaintiff:
Derek Lucas, Luke Yea-El and OG-King
Defendant:
United States, Department of Commerce, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jack Morgan v. BOP, et al
as 22-2731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN CIOLLI
Singer v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv05121
Plaintiff:
Albert Dakota Singer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States of America, Lieutenant Dix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Singer v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv50340
Plaintiff:
Albert Dakota Singer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States of America, Lieutenant Dix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ALDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ALDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Decker v. BOP
as 22-2475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Watson v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv50273
Plaintiff:
Marcus Watson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANCE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHANCE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, C. FENCH and S. DEBRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
