Cases 31 - 40 of 661
Portee v. Beary et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Portee
Defendant:
May Beary, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Mrs. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalcollo v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Justin Dalcollo
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Warden Brown, Alisha Curtwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher-Bey v. Doe 2 et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Fletcher-Bey
Defendant:
John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISH v. HINSHAW et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
TONY PARISH
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW, PENNINGTON, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03357
Plaintiff:
Lesean Jackson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Holzer, B Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
