Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 164
THOMPSON v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff: CAMERSON J. THOMPSON and CAMERON J. THOMPSON
Defendant: DAVE WEDDING, COWLING, CULVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sewell v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff: Theodis Sewell
Defendant: Galipeau, Andrew Pazera, Robinson and others
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BROWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant: RICHARD BROWN, KENNY MITCHELL, J. MANUEL and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREWS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03293
Defendant: DAUSS, JOHN DOES, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff: VICTOR CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON V. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00640
Defendant: Warden TJ Watson and USA
Petitioner: JULIUS OMAR ROBINSON
Respondent: WARDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. NOEL
as 4:2020cv00226
Plaintiff: SPENCER ROBINSON
Defendant: JAMEY NOEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann-El v. Indiana The State of et al
as 3:2020cv00806
Plaintiff: Richard A Spann-El and Richard Allen Spann El
Defendant: Hyatte, Payne, Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHISON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02442
Defendant: MOORE, DAVIS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff: DEREK D.L.S. HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv02390
Plaintiff: DAXTRELL ROBINSON
Defendant: MARK SEVIER, JOHN DOE and K. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2020cv02377
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: CHARLES GREGORY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?