Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Smith et al v. Pennock et al
as 4:2018cv04072
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith, Joshua Warner, Gary Mayfield and others
Defendant:
Wanda Pennock, Paula Lodge, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henigan v. Blanton et al
as 1:2018cv02229
Plaintiff:
O'Brian Jarrqueese Henigan
Defendant:
Officer Blanton, Officer Warner, Jr., Officer Jacenik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas, Deja v. Warner et al
as 3:2017cv00930
Plaintiff:
Deja Dominique Thomas
Defendant:
Warner , Ferstl and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. WARNER et al
as 2:2017cv00557
Defendant:
MR. HOOD-E.C., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MR. SINGH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. THOMPSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. GRIGSBY et al
as 1:2017cv04311
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. ADAMS and SHAWN GRIGSBY
Defendant:
MARTZ, SLINKER and WARNER
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04207
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
James Dimas , Gregg Scott , Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04179
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
Gregg Scott and Lynne Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv05027
Plaintiff:
Darnell Russ
Defendant:
G Murphy, J Costanzo, P Heneghan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Smith, et al v. Paula Lodge, et al
as 17-2277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. SMITH and JOSHUA D. WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAULA D. LODGE, AMBER JELINEK, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Page, Emmanuel v. Hoffman et al
as 3:2017cv00450
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Page
Defendant:
Hoffman , O'Brien , Candice Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
