Cases 51 - 60 of 397
Bowers v. Quarles & Brady LLP et al
as 2:2021cv01207
Petitioner:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Respondent:
Quarles & Brady LLP, Merchant Navy Department, Michael J Gonring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Beasle et al
as 3:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Defendant:
Beasle, Ron Neal, Winn and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brueggen, Isaiah et al v. La Crosse County Jail
as 3:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Brueggen and David Anthony Pearson Jr
Defendant:
La Crosse County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson Jr, David v. La Crosse County
as 3:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Pearson Jr
Defendant:
La Crosse County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Godfrey et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Steven Godfrey, Gale Lyn Palmer, Bart Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Cross and Damien Ray Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker, Cameron v. La Crosse County Jail Jailers
as 3:2021cv00398
Defendant:
La Crosse County Jail Jailers
Plaintiff:
Cameron Baker and Cameron Xavier Baker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker, Cameron v. La Crosse County Jail
as 3:2021cv00399
Defendant:
La Crosse County Jail
Plaintiff:
Cameron Baker and Cameron Xavier Baker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson Jr, David et al v. La Crosse County Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Pearson Jr and Rory Deer
Defendant:
La Crosse County and La Crosse County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin v. Stovall et al
as 3:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Arnold, Nam, Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Larrie M Larkin, Sr
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bragg v. West et al
as 4:2021cv04064
Defendant:
John Doe, II, John Doe, David West and others
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Duane Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
