Cases 51 - 60 of 2,443
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffie v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Cornelious W Duffie
Defendant:
Hernandez, K Sudduth, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner:
Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dority v. Bennet
as 1:2023cv01461
Petitioner:
Angela Michelle Dority
Respondent:
K. Bennet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckles, Kyle v. Rich, K. et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Kyle W. Buckles
Defendant:
Capt. K. Rich, Sgt. D. Oates and Jackson Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swafford v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Gary Swafford
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Glen Austin, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brazier v. East Saint Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03894
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brazier
Defendant:
East Saint Louis Police Department, K. Randolph, J. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv03882
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Smith
Defendant:
Department of Justice, I.D.O.C., Wexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLEY v. NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02159
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K. DILLEY and MICHAEL L. BENNETT
Defendant:
NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., CHRIS NANCREDE, AQUA INDIANA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
