Cases 51 - 60 of 456
Richardson v. Gaston et al
as 1:2022cv05726
Plaintiff:
Cortez Richardson
Defendant:
King Gaston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv50348
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, Bergami, King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James Mosley v. Ripley County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 22-2722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, RYAN KING and others
Gorbey v. Barmes et al
as 3:2022cv50322
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Barmes, Bergami, King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gorbey v. Dole et al
as 3:2022cv50315
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Dole, John Doe, Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kendrick v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Defendant:
Lorre Idown, Nancy Marthakis, Centurion Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kendrick
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv03508
Plaintiff:
Jammie King
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Central Kitchen Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, "Jane" Ellinger, "Jane" King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50181
Petitioner:
Sherond Duron King, Jr.
Respondent:
Mr. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King, Perry v. Keyes, Randy
as 3:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Perry King
Respondent:
Randy Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
