Cases 51 - 60 of 430
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MICKLES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
CANIETRA BROWN, CARLETTE-LASHAY MITCHELLE, NGHIA-LASHAY PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kathy Funtila v. M. Segal
as 22-2075
Petitioner / Appellant:
KATHY FUNTILA
Respondent / Appellee:
M. SEGAL, Warden
Abraham Ybarra v. Kathy Bradshaw-Elliott, et al
as 22-1900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM J. YBARRA
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHY BRADSHAW-ELLIOTT, BRENDA CLAUDIO, LAWRENCE S. BEAUMONT and others
John Gilbert v. Zorian Trusewych, et al
as 22-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN G. GILBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH, KATHY ASHCRAFT, VIPIN SHAH and others
Al-Kassar v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, Jeffrey Graeber, CTU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waugh v. USA et al
as 3:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Waugh
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kathy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Funtila v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01103
Petitioner:
Kathy Funtila
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jayme Smith and Jayme Lee Smith
Defendant:
Coltin Clark, Patty Clouse, Lind L Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD BROWN, LAGENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
