Cases 51 - 60 of 7,031
Tuck v. Cook County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Cook County Correctional Facility and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gloudemans et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Captain Gloudemans, B Eversor, Mr Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sarnowski et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Sarnowski, Ms Archer and Ms Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
