Cases 61 - 70 of 349
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, PABLO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLOUD v. VANSHOYCK et al
as 2:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY MCCLOUD
Defendant:
VANSHOYCK, HEATHER HALL, BARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croom v. Liles et al
as 1:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
J Liles, Andrew Smith, B Summer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau, Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond, Dwayne v. Sabenson et al
as 3:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Almond
Defendant:
Sabenson, Capt. - Ms. Jones, Capt. - Mr. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00368
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC., PABLO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PEREZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN WARDEN OF TERRE HAUTE FCI, UNKNOWN FOOD SERVICES SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00650
Petitioner:
Alberto Perez
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, PABLO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Perez et al
as 1:2021cv03470
Plaintiff:
Temel Redmond
Defendant:
Geary, A. Perez and Sage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
