Cases 61 - 70 of 206
Moore v. Scott, et al
as 3:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Scott, Steven Strubberg, Shane Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00768
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv04184
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Soo Song, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson, Adrian v. Williams, Louis
as 3:2017cv00528
Petitioner:
Adrian Jackson
Respondent:
Louis Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ramirez-Alcantar v. Dennison et al
as 1:2017cv03468
Petitioner:
Adrian Ramirez-Alcantar
Respondent:
Jeff Dennison and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Schott et al
as 2:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Adrian Duran Patterson
Defendant:
John L Schott, Michael Flannery, Erin Tischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Passehl et al
as 1:2017cv01311
Plaintiff:
Denzil Adrian Lawrence
Defendant:
Kimberly Passehl, Deputy D. Cantone, Jeffrey Bostjancic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
