Cases 71 - 80 of 604
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04285
Defendant:
TERRY, ROSHAY, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES INGRAM and CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Snell et al
as 3:2019cv01019
Defendant:
K. Allsup, John R. Baldwin, C/O Fenton and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullum v. State of Illinois, The et al
as 1:2019cv06443
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
State of Illinois, The, Daniel J. Pierce, John B Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2019cv01314
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Lt Wickman, C O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Octavius Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovejoy v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2019cv00969
Defendant:
Kelly Pierce, Doug Lyerla, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN et al v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC., NIKKI TAFOYA, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZARAGOZA and ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nejmanowski v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2019cv03185
Defendant:
Kim Smith, . Pierce, IDOC A.R.B. and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Nejmanowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, AGNES A. OPOKU, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Ingram
Defendant:
Agnes A Opoku, Willson, Knight and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winger v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2019cv00474
Defendant:
Rowold, Sgt Harris, Holly Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Winger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
