Cases 71 - 80 of 451
EDWARDS v. GRAND COMMANDER SOVEREIGN PLAINTIFF OF UNIVERSAL FREEMASONRY et al
as 1:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
AHMAD EDWARDS
Defendant:
GRAND COMMANDER SOVEREIGN PLAINTIFF OF UNIVERSAL FREEMASONRY, PALMYRA REFLECTOR, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC IN STUDIES OF ALL DOCUMENTARY EXPERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2021cv03111
Plaintiff:
AHMAD EDWARDS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Petitioner:
RONALD-EDWARDS WILLIAMS EL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROCKWELL v. LAMMER
as 2:2021cv00451
Petitioner:
EDWARD HOWARD ROCKWELL, JR.
Respondent:
BRIAN LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edwards v. Stevens et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Dominique J Edwards
Defendant:
Stevens and Zimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATWOOD v. CITY OF SHELBYVILLE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD ATWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF SHELBYVILLE, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, SHELBY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00895
Petitioner:
Nykie Edwards
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JERVIS v. INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
JACK JERVIS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKEY, RAINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ATES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00418
Plaintiff:
ROY EDWARD ATES, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
