Cases 71 - 80 of 174
Louden Jr v. Carter et al
as 1:2018cv05242
Defendant:
Carter, Guyer, North Shore Evanston Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eric Louden Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv02265
Defendant:
A UNKNOWN OFFICER THAT WOULD NOT IDENTIFY HIM OR HER SELF WHEN WAS ASK TO PLEASE DO SO, ON OR AROUND 1:35 PM ON JULY-21-2018-FROM THE CONTROLL WATCH TOWER AT SAID TIME AND DAY, MATT MYERS and UNKNOWN OFFICER
Plaintiff:
RANDY H. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ressa v. Zaruba et al
as 1:2018cv04117
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Ressa
Defendant:
John E. Zaruba and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Andre Foster
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Unknown Officer #1 and Unknown Officer #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumlin v. Varga et al
as 3:2017cv50395
Plaintiff:
Deshawn T. Sumlin
Defendant:
John Varga, Chad Jenkins, Rogerio Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENDRE v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2017cv04446
Defendant:
DANIELS and UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ybarra v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv07400
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ybarra
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Nneka Jones Tapia, Debbie Boecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Griffin et al
as 3:2017cv00652
Defendant:
Kathy Griffin, Reggal, Sharon Hawks and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv06092
Plaintiff:
Jamal Walker
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Darren Ohle, Matthew Diblich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holly v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04501
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Edwards, Marcus Hardy, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff:
David Darnell Holly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
