Cases 81 - 90 of 387
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04070
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Michael R Hendricks
Defendant:
. Curran, Heather .., Kylee .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MARSHALL
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, MAKAYLA, HEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Richard v. Perrault, Heather et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Johnson
Defendant:
Heather Perrault, Lona Sullivan and Mykalia Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz, Mark v. Johnson, Terry et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Schultz
Defendant:
Deputy Terry Johnson, Deputy Robert Liebe and Sgt. Heather Burr
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stechauner, Matthew v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Stechauner
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Kevin Carr, Leigha Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Orr v. Zorian Trusewych, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
WILLIE D. ORR
Defendant:
ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH, Doctor, JESSICA GIVENS, PENNY SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
