Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Rogers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01682
Petitioner:
Patrick D Rogers
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Dennis Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Talley, Randy v. Gloede, Carl et al
as 3:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Randy Talley
Defendant:
Carl Gloede, Lynnea Coffey and Dane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFEY v. KNOX COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
RANDY ALLEN COFFEY
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY JAIL, VANTLIN and DEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffey v. Chasteen et al
as 3:2023cv50163
Plaintiff:
John P Coffey
Defendant:
Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Pamela McBrie, Patrice Galor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffey v. Chasteen et al
as 1:2023cv02838
Plaintiff:
John P Coffey
Defendant:
Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Pamela McBrie, Patrice Galor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffey v. Chasteen et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
John P Coffey
Defendant:
Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Pamela McBrie, Patrice Galor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cantwell et al
as 2:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Davis
Defendant:
. Cantwell, . Coffey, . Henshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2021cv04638
Plaintiff:
Ernest Coffey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Phyllis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenzie v. Erksine et al
as 3:2021cv50048
Defendant:
T.K. Ramierez, R. Erksine, Dr. Levy and others
Plaintiff:
Davon McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Reglin et al
as 3:2021cv50023
Defendant:
Pohl, Forrest, Sonja Nicklaus and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
