Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JAMES v. HARMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
TYWAN JAMES
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMAN, AMANDA TERRY, KOSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanton v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Defendant:
John Doe, John Galipeau, Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWSER v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, HENRY COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02400
Plaintiff:
CORY A. ROWSER
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, HENRY COUNTY, DANIEL O. RIPPATOE, JENNIFER A. HARMAN-NARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ybarra v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy R Ybarra
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Harman, Neal and others
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMAN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv02621
Defendant:
ALYCIA MCCULLOUGH, PAUL A. TALBOT, CARRIE WELDER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. HARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2018cv01695
Petitioner:
DAVID J. HARMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pegues v. Coe et al
as 3:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Adam Pegues
Defendant:
John Coe, Phil Martin, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manges v. Harman et al
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Timothy P Manges
Defendant:
Terry Harman , David Rogers , Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Merchant et al
as 3:2009cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Mitchell
Defendant:
Jay Merchant, Sherry Benton, Rodger E Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hayden et al
as 1:2008cv01375
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Mitchell
Defendant:
T Hayden, C Ruyon, J Townley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
