Cases 1 - 10 of 185
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hunt v. USA
as 4:2024cv04056
Petitioner:
Jajuan Amond Hunt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hunt v. Lutz et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Nicole Lutz, Champaign County, Illinois, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. USA
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
David Hunt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hunt v. Reagle et al
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, David Liebel, Andrew Pazera and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Reagle et al
as 3:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, David Liebel, Andrew Pazera and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv03331
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Michael Cox, Tiona Farrington, Doug Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
