Cases 1 - 10 of 2,448
Swartz v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Henry Swartz
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Kelly Nelson, Daniel Rainy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Defendant:
Capt Daniel Cushing, Capt Michael Cole, Lt Anthony Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Peterson et al
as 3:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ashton Daniel
Defendant:
J. Peterson, Daniel Monti, Doctor Aorora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMPTON v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
DANIEL COMPTON
Respondent:
GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
DANIEL SMITH
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Gilman v. Samuel Byrd, et al
as 24-1951
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. GILMAN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, M.D., CHELSEY PEARISON, R.N., BARBARA RIGGS, R.N. and others
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Hale et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Danielle Hale, Karyn Conner and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLBROOK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOLBROOK
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. KING
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
