Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gould v. USA
as 2:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Charles Gould
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Hartzheim et al
as 2:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Wesley James Jones
Defendant:
Alex Hartzheim, Alan Johnson and Cody Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallett v. Gould et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Cameron Blake Hallett
Defendant:
William M Gould, Hake, Sickafoose and others
Not Classified By Court:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallett v. Gould et al
as 3:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Cameron Blake Hallett
Defendant:
William M Gould, Hake, Sickafoose and others
Not Classified By Court:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Allen Co. Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Francisco M Vazquez and Francisco Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
Allen Co. Jail, Hershberger, Dr. Gallparin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Foster et al
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Keith Myers
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Joshua M Adderton, David A Dingman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Moungey et al
as 2:2021cv01204
Defendant:
CO Goodman, CO Moungey, Andrew Moungey and others
Plaintiff:
Emon V Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Dorethy et al
as 4:2021cv04059
Plaintiff:
Cristian Ramos
Defendant:
. Bryan, Michael Gould, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould Jr. v. Bertoncini
as 2:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles Gould Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Bertoncini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. Wisconsin Resource Center
as 2:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Wisconsin Resource Center
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
