Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Jenkins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv02413
Defendant:
Sgt Phillips, Lt Keifer, Joshua Schoenbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Kejuan Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RACKEMANN v. FOX et al
as 1:2024cv01441
Defendant:
RAIDER, HAAKIE, C. HOUCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RACKEMANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britten v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01265
Defendant:
. Wurster, . Shelton, LaToya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Britten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hancock
Defendant:
Unknown, Spurlock, Mr. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. USA
as 3:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Jaylan D. Quinn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sponhower v. Wexford of Indiana LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Elgin Andrew Sponhower and Elgin Sponhower
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Wexford of Indiana LLC, John Galipeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sponhower v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Defendant:
Centiuron of Indiana LLC, Indiana Department of Corrections, Centiuron of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Elgin Andrew Sponhower
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Jarvela
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Jake Quinn
Defendant:
Denise Jarvela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Hvarre
as 1:2023cv16619
Petitioner:
Samuel Quinn
Respondent:
Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
