Cases 1 - 10 of 451
Sanders v. Hutchings et al
as 3:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Cordell Sanders
Defendant:
Jada Hutchings, Sergeant Bridwell, Robert E Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Quordalis V Sanders
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Christopher Nurse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico Sanders v. Tony Evers, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICO SANDERS
Defendant:
TONY EVERS, KEVIN CARR and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Dynzel v. Sanders, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dynzel Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Sanders, Paula Kuecker, Feltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
