Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bentley v. Morris et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dominique Bentley
Defendant:
Carri Morris, S. Buettner, Ms. Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES et al v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES, NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL and others
Defendant:
TERRI HARRIS, CORDOVA, GALLERIA MALL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv03349
Petitioner:
Francisco Akins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08477
Plaintiff:
Roy Akins
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01725
Petitioner:
ROBERT AKINS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins, Arsenio v. Dittman et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Arsenio R. Akins
Defendant:
Dittman , Meredith Nashak, Degager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akins v. Beachum et al
as 1:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
John Akins
Defendant:
Sgt. Beachum and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akins v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00525
Plaintiff:
Francisco Akins
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Robert Shearing, Dr. Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kolak v. Rice et al
as 1:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
Walter Kolak
Defendant:
John Rice, Samuel Lopez, C Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akins v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv03251
Petitioner:
Timothy D Akins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
