Cases 1 - 10 of 40
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent:
JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. TRAPP et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
TYLER C. BARTON
Defendant:
J. TRAPP, JAMES DELANO, HASSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Tetzloff et al
as 3:2023cv00738
Defendant:
Jeniffer Tetzloff, Jeniff Tetzloff, Kim Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEDFORD v. BARTON
as 1:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
JARMICHAEL LEDFORD
Defendant:
DEPUTY BARTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv03231
Plaintiff:
David Howell
Defendant:
Bobby Ford, Denise McGarvey, Barton Healthcare LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Christopher S. Thompson, Robert E. Wegman, Brandon A. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Foerg et al
as 3:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Jeffery K Richwine, Dale J Starkes, Phillip Foerg and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Barton et al
as 3:2019cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard
Defendant:
Seth Barton and Loki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
