Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1834
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
MATTHEW BURNS, CYNTHIA RADTKE, Captain, JEREMY WESTRA and others
Trais Haire v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
TRAIS FERNANDEZ HAIRE
Defendant:
MATTHEW BURNS, sued as Lt Burns, JEREMY STANIEC, Officer, sued as Lt Stanrec, JEREMY WESTRA, sued as Cpt Westra and others
Johnson v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dewhite D Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Fisher, Matthew Burns, Joseph Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Quordalis Sanders v. William Griesbach, et al
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, VICTORIA VAN-BURNS, P.A. KROOL and others
Burns v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Defendant:
Galloway, Hughes and Il Dept Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Martin Anaya
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. Bennett, . Smythe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Falkenburry v. Burns et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Frank S Falkenburry
Defendant:
Robert D Burns, Garrett Etherton, Nicholas Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Fox et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Defendant:
Parole Agent Fox, Brooke Settle, Parole Agent Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
