Cases 1 - 10 of 111
COMBS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kankakee County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Isiah Robinson
Defendant:
Kankakee County Jail, Livingston County Jail and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. ELIS et al
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
ELIS, REAGLE, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
DEAN COMBS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Darelle Davis
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, . Moss and . Jerkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Oneal et al
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
Darelle Davis
Defendant:
. Oneal, John Doe and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ownbey v. Jerome Combs et al
as 2:2022cv02221
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Ownbey
Defendant:
Jerome Combs, Stateville Correctional Center and Robinson Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toms v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toms
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
