Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sovereign Freeman, Sovereignty Joeseph v. McLain, Jerret et al
as 3:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Sovereignty Joeseph Helmueller Sovereign Freeman and Andrew Jacob Helmueller
Defendant:
Jerret McLain, McKenzie Hazen, Craig Yahlik and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv03922
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03827
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith, Charles v. Maier
as 3:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Kittenger et al
as 1:2017cv02726
Plaintiff:
Tyjuan Zedric Young
Defendant:
Theresa Kittenger, Charles Smith, Zack Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAFFORD, ET AL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 1:2017cv00289
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., CORIZON HEALTH, INC., MONICA GIPSON, R.N. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH, DOUGLAS SMITH and MICHAEL RAY STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Akpore et al
as 1:2015cv01017
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Kevwe Akpore, James . Carothers, Stephen Damewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00014
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05294
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Beth et al
as 2:2011cv00996
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Beth, Charles Smith, Captain Falduto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
