Cases 1 - 10 of 118
WELLS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Defendant:
CHARLIE FOX, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC., ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGASON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01154
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE, COOPRIDER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HIGGASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01153
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, ANDREW COLE, CHARLIE FOX and others
Plaintiff:
RAYSHON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Defendant:
HOCKEY, FOX, A. TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cole Hancock
Defendant:
Erin Williams, Marla Doughman and J Smiley
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
