Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Marwitz et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D Jones
Defendant:
Lukas Marwitz, Mary Baggio and Robert Rymarkiewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Krueger et al
as 2:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D Jones
Defendant:
Heather Krueger, Alexander Hollfelder and Dr Jasmine Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kiac et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D Jones
Defendant:
Sgt Kiac, Lt Thomason, CO Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03163
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Greene, . Settles, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Greene et al
as 1:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Greene, Officer Settles, Case Worker 3 House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. JONES
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. County of Milwaukee
as 2:2022cv01384
Petitioner:
Jamal D Jones
Defendant:
County of Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Granite City Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01656
Petitioner:
Garrett D. Jones
Respondent:
Granite City Police Department, Madison County Judicial System and Thomas A. Haine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
